Tag Archive for: AI governance

Posts

Person working at a desk with a laptop displaying a document workflow, surrounded by folders and paperwork

Microsoft Copilot for Legal: Who Controls the Future of Legal AI?

/
Microsoft has launched Copilot for Legal. Mike Murphy highlights its distribution advantage. JSH Law examines the CMA's concerns, legal AI competition, professional duties and what this means for family justice.
Person working at a desk with a laptop displaying a document workflow, surrounded by folders and paperwork

OpenAI Is Retiring Custom GPTs: What Law Firms, Legal Professionals and Litigants in Person Need to Know

/
OpenAI is retiring custom GPTs, but ChatGPT itself is not closing. JSH Law explains the transition to plugins, what happens to existing conversations, the important deadlines, and how legal teams and litigants in person can protect their work.
Smartphone location and security data illustrating technology-facilitated abuse and digital evidence in Family Court proceedings.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd

AI Can Hack Humans Too: Why Family Justice Must Defend the Human Decision-Maker

/
AI can impersonate and pressure real people. What does that mean for digital evidence, coercive control and the people who make decisions in family court?
Jessica Susan Hill beside a legal AI-themed background with the headline “AI Can Write 300 Pages – That Does Not Make It Advocacy”, illustrating responsible use of AI in court documents.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. AI-assisted original artwork created for JSH Law using supplied JSH Law branding and portrait photography. All rights reserved.

When Confidence Outruns Evidence: What 1929 Can Teach Us About AI in Police Interviews

/
The 1929 crash and AI in police interviews are not the same—but both reveal the danger of institutions trusting confidence over evidence. An evidence-led JSH Law analysis.
Two people review documents at a table beside a laptop displaying a diagram

AI Is Already in the Courts: Why Family Justice Needs Hard Red Lines

/
AI is entering legal services and courts. JSH Law identifies safeguards for children, evidence integrity, human accountability and fair procedure.
JSH Law LinkedIn graphic for Family Justice, Recoded?, exploring family justice, legal technology and access to justice© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Trauma-Informed Lawyering Is Not Enough: Legal Technology Needs Guardrails Too

/
Trauma-informed family justice requires more than good intentions. Explore practical safeguards for legal AI, court documents, confidentiality and vulnerable parties.
Jessica Susan Hill beside a legal AI-themed background with the headline “AI Can Write 300 Pages – That Does Not Make It Advocacy”, illustrating responsible use of AI in court documents.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. AI-assisted original artwork created for JSH Law using supplied JSH Law branding and portrait photography. All rights reserved.

Legal AI Is Rebuilding the Legal Services Market — But Who Will It Serve?

/
.jsh-legaltech-article { max-width: 980px; margin:…
JSH Law graphic exploring whether AI can be trusted with Family Court documents and the difference between open and closed AI systems© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

A Human in the Loop Is Not Enough: “Humanwashing”, AI and the Future of Judicial Decision-Making

/
A major 2026 study found that putting a human judge back into an AI-assisted decision can largely eliminate the perceived fairness gap — even where the human review is minimal. JSH Law examines the risk of “humanwashing”, automation bias and what meaningful judicial oversight should actually require.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

When AI Stops Answering and Starts Acting: Agentic AI, Legal Responsibility and the Next Professional Risk

/
Agentic AI can plan, select tools and take actions across legal workflows. That creates a new set of risks around authority, confidentiality, supervision and accountability. JSH Law asks what responsible delegation should look like.