© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Mazur, AI, and the Future of Legal Support | JSH Law
/
0 Comments
Mazur defines the legal boundaries. AI expands capability. Together, they are reshaping how legal support works.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.The “Vibe Lawyer” Moment: AI, Litigants in Person, and the Coming Shockwave for the Family Courts
Artificial intelligence is entering UK courtrooms at scale. This article examines the risks, opportunities and judicial warnings surrounding AI use by litigants in person — and how to use it responsibly in family proceedings.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When Court Data Disappears: Why Transparency in Family Courts Matters More Than Ever
The Ministry of Justice’s decision to delete archived court data has raised significant questions about open justice, AI governance and transparency. This article examines what the controversy means in practical terms for family court users and litigants-in-person navigating delay, safeguarding disputes and systemic opacity.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.The Use of AI in Preparing Court Documents: Why the Civil Justice Council Consultation Matters
The Civil Justice Council has launched an eight-week consultation…

Access to Justice Will Not Improve Until Litigants in Person Are Treated as First-Class Legal Tech Users
Litigants in person are no longer the exception — they are the system. This article explores why courts, regulators, and legal-tech designers must start building for LiPs if access to justice is to mean anything in practice.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Permission Refused? Using AI to decide what to do next — and when to stop
Permission refused in Judicial Review can feel devastating. This guide explains what refusal really means, when to renew, when to stop — and how AI can help litigants in person decide wisely.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Managing Deadlines, Bundles, and Compliance with AI – Procedural discipline in Judicial Review (where cases are really lost)
Many Judicial Review cases fail on procedure, not law. This guide shows how litigants in person can use AI to manage deadlines, bundles, and compliance safely.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.From Pre-Action Protocol to Permission – Structuring Judicial Review grounds with AI — and avoiding merits traps
Most Judicial Review claims fail at permission stage. This guide explains how litigants in person can structure grounds properly — and use AI to avoid fatal merits drift.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Drafting a Pre-Action Protocol Letter with AI Support – Applying lawful pressure before Judicial Review proceedings
Most Judicial Review cases should resolve before proceedings. This guide explains how litigants in person can draft a strong Pre-Action Protocol letter using AI — without undermining credibility.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Organising Evidence for Judicial Review with AI – What the Court Expects — and What It Will Not Tolerate
Judicial Review cases succeed or fail on evidence. This guide explains how litigants in person can use AI to organise evidence properly — without losing the court’s trust.
