Tag Archive for: Legal AI

You are here: / / Legal AI

Content exploring the use of artificial intelligence within legal processes, with a focus on implications for family justice.

Posts

Person working at a desk with a laptop displaying a document workflow, surrounded by folders and paperwork

OpenAI Is Retiring Custom GPTs: What Law Firms, Legal Professionals and Litigants in Person Need to Know

/
0 Comments
OpenAI is retiring custom GPTs, but ChatGPT itself is not closing. JSH Law explains the transition to plugins, what happens to existing conversations, the important deadlines, and how legal teams and litigants in person can protect their work.
Woman reviewing a laptop displaying a document workflow and checklist at a desk

AI Liability in UK Legal Practice: SRA Duties, Court Evidence and Data Protection

/
0 Comments
As AI agents move beyond answering questions to taking action, who is legally responsible when something goes wrong? This technical JSH Law analysis examines English law, professional accountability, SRA duties, court evidence, confidentiality, automated decisions, legal fees and the changing future of AI systems.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Agents in Family Court: How Much Control Are You Giving Them?

/
0 Comments
Not every AI tool is equally agentic. Some simply answer questions; others can read documents, use tools, interact with applications and carry out multi-step workflows. For litigants in person, understanding that spectrum matters because the more an AI system can do, the more carefully its access, permissions and supervision need to be managed.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Agents & Family Court: A Guide for Litigants in Person

/
0 Comments
AI agents go beyond answering questions: they can potentially work through documents, organise evidence, build chronologies and complete multi-step tasks. For litigants in person, that could be genuinely transformative — but only if AI is directed carefully, evidence is verified and human judgement remains firmly in control.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The JSH Law Legal Tech Test: Which Platforms Actually Improve Access to Justice?

/
0 Comments
JSH Law launches a 100-point Legal Tech Test to examine whether legal platforms genuinely improve access to justice. Beginning with CaseCraft AI, the series will assess legal reliability, regulation, privacy, cost, human support and safeguarding—separating useful innovation from polished but potentially unsafe automation.
JSH Law graphic for The Legal AI Trust Test, explaining seven checks before relying on ChatGPT or other AI-generated material in court© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Legal AI Trust Test: Seven Checks Before You Rely on ChatGPT or Any AI in Court

/
0 Comments
ChatGPT can help a litigant in person organise evidence and prepare clearer court documents—but it can also invent cases, distort facts and expose confidential material. JSH Law’s seven-point Legal AI Trust Test explains what to check before relying on any AI-generated answer in proceedings in England and Wales.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Family Law Technologists: Where AI Meets Evidence, Safeguarding and Justice. My Two Penneth.

/
0 Comments
Artificial intelligence could make legal help more affordable and accessible—particularly for litigants in person. But in family law, where cases involve children, domestic abuse, confidential evidence and safeguarding risk, accuracy and human judgment are essential. Jessica Susan Hill examines the “fine structure of justice” and the six principles that must govern responsible legal AI.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Has Helped Win a UK Court Case — But It Is Not the Story Some Headlines Suggest

/
0 Comments
Garfield AI’s reported court success is a genuine legal technology milestone — but not because AI replaced a lawyer in court. The real significance is more practical: regulated AI may help ordinary people and small businesses pursue claims that would otherwise be too expensive to bring. This article explains what the case really means, why it is not a binding legal precedent, and why family lawyers and litigants in person should pay close attention.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Truth About Using ChatGPT for Family Court as a Litigant in Person

/
0 Comments
As more litigants in person turn to ChatGPT and AI tools for help with family court proceedings, the justice system is being forced to confront a new reality. This in-depth JSH Law article explores what ChatGPT genuinely does well, where it becomes dangerous, what guidance solicitors and barristers have been given about AI, and whether courts are beginning to regulate its use.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Legal Tech for Litigants in Person: The Tools That Can Help You Survive Court Without a Solicitor

/
0 Comments
A practical JSH Law guide to the legal tech, AI tools, court resources, evidence apps and support platforms that can help litigants in person prepare more effectively.