Tag Archive for: legal technology

Posts

Smartphone location and security data illustrating technology-facilitated abuse and digital evidence in Family Court proceedings.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd

AI Can Hack Humans Too: Why Family Justice Must Defend the Human Decision-Maker

/
AI can impersonate and pressure real people. What does that mean for digital evidence, coercive control and the people who make decisions in family court?
Jessica Susan Hill beside a legal AI-themed background with the headline “AI Can Write 300 Pages – That Does Not Make It Advocacy”, illustrating responsible use of AI in court documents.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. AI-assisted original artwork created for JSH Law using supplied JSH Law branding and portrait photography. All rights reserved.

When Confidence Outruns Evidence: What 1929 Can Teach Us About AI in Police Interviews

/
The 1929 crash and AI in police interviews are not the same—but both reveal the danger of institutions trusting confidence over evidence. An evidence-led JSH Law analysis.
Two people review documents at a table beside a laptop displaying a diagram

AI Is Already in the Courts: Why Family Justice Needs Hard Red Lines

/
AI is entering legal services and courts. JSH Law identifies safeguards for children, evidence integrity, human accountability and fair procedure.
Jessica Susan Hill of JSH Law beside the title “Family Court Disclosure”, illustrating police, medical, school, social care and Cafcass records in Family Court proceedings.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd / Jessica Susan Hill

Your Family Court Case Needs a System: CRM, AI and Evidence for Litigants in Person

/
How to organise a family court case like a manageable project: orders, evidence, deadlines, chronology, safe AI tools and practical systems for litigants in person.
JSH Law LinkedIn graphic for Family Justice, Recoded?, exploring family justice, legal technology and access to justice© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Trauma-Informed Lawyering Is Not Enough: Legal Technology Needs Guardrails Too

/
Trauma-informed family justice requires more than good intentions. Explore practical safeguards for legal AI, court documents, confidentiality and vulnerable parties.
Jessica Susan Hill beside a legal AI-themed background with the headline “AI Can Write 300 Pages – That Does Not Make It Advocacy”, illustrating responsible use of AI in court documents.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. AI-assisted original artwork created for JSH Law using supplied JSH Law branding and portrait photography. All rights reserved.

Legal AI Is Rebuilding the Legal Services Market — But Who Will It Serve?

/
.jsh-legaltech-article { max-width: 980px; margin:…
JSH Law graphic exploring whether AI can be trusted with Family Court documents and the difference between open and closed AI systems© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI May Democratise Legal Drafting. Can the Courts Survive the Volume?

/
Generative AI may lower one of the traditional barriers to enforcing legal rights: the cost of producing legal material. But judicial attention remains scarce. JSH Law examines what happens if AI scales legal drafting faster than the court system can scale its capacity.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

When AI Stops Answering and Starts Acting: Agentic AI, Legal Responsibility and the Next Professional Risk

/
Agentic AI can plan, select tools and take actions across legal workflows. That creates a new set of risks around authority, confidentiality, supervision and accountability. JSH Law asks what responsible delegation should look like.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

If AI Does the Junior Work, Who Trains the Lawyers of 2035?

/
Artificial intelligence is automating many of the tasks traditionally used to train junior lawyers. If clients will no longer pay for repetitive processing, the profession must become much more deliberate about teaching judgment, ethics, strategy and client counselling.