Tag Archive for: legal technology

Posts

JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Jury Trial U-Turn Is Not the End of Court Reform: What the 2026 Courts and Tribunals Bill Still Changes

/
The Government has abandoned its wider plan for judge-alone Crown Court trials — but the Courts and Tribunals Bill is far from dead. JSH Law examines what still changes, including jury-trial election, magistrates’ powers, criminal appeals, AI-assisted court administration and the proposed repeal of the Family Court’s parental-involvement presumption.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Should AI Become a Legal Person? Imogen Rivers, Robot Rights and the Responsibility Gap

/
Could an autonomous AI hold legal rights, owe legal duties or become responsible when things go wrong? Drawing on Imogen Rivers' Oxford research, JSH Law examines robot rights, lethal autonomous weapons, responsibility gaps and the danger of allowing artificial personhood to become a liability shield for humans.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Can State Facts. Can It Tell the Truth? Why the Difference Matters in Law

/
AI can generate a factually correct sentence. But can it truthfully speak in the human sense — with knowledge, belief and responsibility behind the words? Drawing on Kim and Jo's work on Heidegger and Foucault, JSH Law asks what the distinction means for witness statements, Family Court evidence and responsible legal AI.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Can AI Feel Pain? What the “Pain Axis” Study Really Means for Human Safety and Legal AI

/
A viral study says AI models contain a “pain axis” and may accept harm to users in order to remove an induced internal state. The research does not prove AI consciousness. Its more immediate significance is what it reveals about model behaviour, human safety and the risks of giving increasingly capable AI systems consequential powers.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Delay Is Not Administrative: What Family Justice Can Learn from the New Criminal Court Listing Framework

/
A new national criminal-court listing framework requires judges to consider the human impact of delay. It does not apply to the Family Court — but its central principle raises an important question for family justice: are we measuring delay in weeks, or by what those weeks actually do to children and families?
Jessica Susan Hill beside a legal AI-themed background with the headline “AI Can Write 300 Pages – That Does Not Make It Advocacy”, illustrating responsible use of AI in court documents.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. AI-assisted original artwork created for JSH Law using supplied JSH Law branding and portrait photography. All rights reserved.

AI Can Write 300 Pages. That Does Not Make It Advocacy.

/
A litigant filed a 300-page ChatGPT-assisted skeleton argument. The real lesson from Hancox v Sutherland is not that AI has no place in court, but that technology cannot replace verification, evidential discipline, relevance or human judgment.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Evidence in the Family Court: Deepfakes, Screenshots & Digital Evidence

/
AI can generate convincing text, audio, photographs and video — and the Ministry of Justice has now identified synthetic and manipulated evidence as an emerging risk to the justice system. For family-court litigants, the practical response is not panic. It is better evidence discipline: preserve originals, retain context, record provenance and understand what each item actually proves.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

AI Agents in Family Court: How Much Control Are You Giving Them?

/
Not every AI tool is equally agentic. Some simply answer questions; others can read documents, use tools, interact with applications and carry out multi-step workflows. For litigants in person, understanding that spectrum matters because the more an AI system can do, the more carefully its access, permissions and supervision need to be managed.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Before You Press Submit: Why AI Prompt Governance Matters in Legal Work and Family Justice

/
The prompt is an information transfer, not just a question. This article examines Genevieve Cripps’ work on prompt governance and explains how legal professionals, organisations and litigants in person can use AI without losing control of confidentiality, evidence, safeguarding or human accountability.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The JSH Law Legal Tech Test: Which Platforms Actually Improve Access to Justice?

/
JSH Law launches a 100-point Legal Tech Test to examine whether legal platforms genuinely improve access to justice. Beginning with CaseCraft AI, the series will assess legal reliability, regulation, privacy, cost, human support and safeguarding—separating useful innovation from polished but potentially unsafe automation.