Posts

Jack and Paul’s Law: Ending the Presumption of Parental Involvement in Family Court
/
0 Comments
Jack and Paul’s Law would remove the presumption of parental involvement. What the reform, Kate Kniveton’s High Court case and current domestic abuse safeguards mean for children and families.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Form C2 Family Court Application (2026): When to Use It, How to Complete It and What to File
Need to make a C2 application in an ongoing family court case? Learn when Form C2 is appropriate, how to complete the June 2026 version, current fees, evidence, safeguarding and filing steps.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.“Welfare Is Not Enough”: Re E [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 and Special Guardianship Orders in Care Proceedings
In Re E [2026] EWCA Civ 1167, the Court of Appeal held that a Special Guardianship Order placing a child permanently outside the birth family could not be approached as a simple welfare choice. JSH Law explains why threshold, factual findings, necessity and proportionality matter.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When a 15-Year-Old Refuses Contact: Why the Family Court Discharged the Child Arrangements Order
What happens when a Child Arrangements Order intended to preserve a relationship begins damaging it? In [2026] EWFC 277 (B), the Family Court discharged an order concerning a 15-year-old who had refused contact with his father for around nine months.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.My Child Is Living Under a Special Guardianship Order and I Want Them Back: What Can I Actually Do?
A Special Guardianship Order is a serious long-term order, but it is not adoption and it is not necessarily the end of a birth parent's relationship with their child. This practical guide explains contact, discharge, significant change in circumstances, disputed expert evidence and how to turn understandable anger into evidence the Family Court can act upon.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Cafcass, Domestic Abuse Allegations and Fact-Finding: Lessons from Re D
The Court of Appeal’s decision in D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic Abuse Allegations) [2026] EWCA Civ 969 explains that Cafcass can assess safeguarding risks but cannot treat disputed allegations as established facts. The judgment highlights when fact-finding may need reconsideration, the importance of the welfare checklist and practical issues for litigants in person responding to section 7 reports.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When a Child Says “No Contact”
A child saying they do not want contact with a parent is important evidence — but it does not always answer the welfare question. This article examines PD12J, domestic abuse, indirect contact, Cafcass, wishes and feelings, contact breakdown and why understanding how a child reached their position can be just as important as recording the position itself.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Putting Children First in Family Law | JSH Law
“Putting children first” is easy to say. This article examines what it should require from parents, lawyers, Cafcass and the Family Court—while making clear that reducing conflict must never mean overlooking domestic abuse or safeguarding risk.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Neurodivergent Children and the Family Court | JSH Law
Neurodivergence is not a difficult-behaviour label and it is not a welfare analysis. This article explains why the Family Court must understand the individual child’s communication, sensory, routine and regulation needs before deciding arrangements.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Family Courts “Not Good Enough” for Women and Children? Why This Matters for Every Parent in England and Wales
A government minister has admitted that family courts in England and Wales are “not good enough” for women and children. This article examines what that means for litigants in person, domestic abuse survivors, and parents navigating private law children proceedings, including the rollout of Child Focused Courts and the proposed repeal of the presumption of parental involvement.
