© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Stolen Babies: Britain’s Forced Adoption Scandal
/
0 Comments
BBC documentary Stolen Babies exposes how unmarried mothers were shamed, controlled and separated from their babies through a system supported by the state and public institutions. Britain has finally apologised—but has family justice fully learned what happens when professional certainty, class prejudice and institutional power overwhelm individual evidence?
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Your Nervous System Is Not Separate From Your Family Court Case
A frightened or exhausted parent is not automatically an unreliable one. This article examines why family courts, Cafcass and professionals must assess safeguarding concerns, children’s wishes and parental behaviour in their full context.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Justice System “National Emergency”: What the Crisis Means for Domestic Abuse Survivors and Family Court Users
The Victims’ Commissioner has warned that pressures across the criminal justice system have the “hallmarks of a national emergency”. JSH Law examines what systemic delay, fragmented information and overstretched services can mean for domestic abuse survivors, children and litigants in person navigating the Family Court.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.The Order Is No Longer Working: What to Do Before You Go Back to Family Court
A final child arrangements order is not necessarily the end of the story. But before applying again, litigants in person need to identify the correct procedure, the evidence that has genuinely changed and the orders that are realistically sought. This JSH Law guide explains how a structured family court case review can help.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Canada Is Treating Coercive Control as a Pattern — Are UK Family Courts Doing Enough?
Canada is developing a striking three-layer legal response to coercive control across family, civil and criminal law. JSH Law examines what has actually changed, why social-media descriptions of a new “tier” of family violence need clarification, and what England and Wales can learn about patterns of abuse, children, post-separation control and family-court evidence.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Can a secret recording be used as evidence in the Family Court?
Can secret recordings expose domestic abuse and protect victim-survivors—or can surveillance damage children and undermine a family court case? This international, evidence-led guide explains the law in England and Wales, the lessons from a major Australian judgment and how litigants in person should handle recordings properly.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Before You Press Submit: Why AI Prompt Governance Matters in Legal Work and Family Justice
The prompt is an information transfer, not just a question. This article examines Genevieve Cripps’ work on prompt governance and explains how legal professionals, organisations and litigants in person can use AI without losing control of confidentiality, evidence, safeguarding or human accountability.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.9,300 Domestic Abusers Set for Release: What Victims Need to Know
A newspaper front page shared by domestic abuse campaigner Zoe Dronfield has reignited concerns about the release of domestic abuse perpetrators. JSH Law examines the reported figure, licence conditions, probation failures, family court implications and the practical steps victims can take to protect themselves and their children.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Family Court Changes August 2026: What Parents Need to Know
Important family justice changes are taking effect this summer. JSH Law explains the new rules for expert witnesses, revised FHDRA listing guidance, the growing legal-aid gap, pressure on Cafcass and why AI-generated material must be checked before it reaches the court.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.The JSH Law Legal Tech Test: Which Platforms Actually Improve Access to Justice?
JSH Law launches a 100-point Legal Tech Test to examine whether legal platforms genuinely improve access to justice. Beginning with CaseCraft AI, the series will assess legal reliability, regulation, privacy, cost, human support and safeguarding—separating useful innovation from polished but potentially unsafe automation.
