Understand coercive and controlling behaviour in relationships and how a pattern of conduct may affect family court proceedings.

These articles explore intimidation, isolation, financial restrictions, surveillance and post-separation tactics, with a focus on evidence, context and the impact on children.

Learn how to organise relevant events without relying on labels alone.

JSH Law can assist with chronologies and evidence schedules for litigants in person.

Woman reviewing messages on a smartphone and laptop at a desk with documents

JADEing and Coercive Control: When You Are Forced to Explain Yourself, Even After Separation

JADEing means justifying, arguing, defending and explaining yourself. Discover when repeated demands for explanations may indicate a wider pattern of coercive control, how the pattern can continue after separation, and how to assess communication evidence in the Family Court.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

When the Towels Are “Wrong”: What Biderman’s Chart of Coercion Can Teach the Family Court

/
Towels folded the “wrong” way can sound utterly trivial. But inside a wider system of coercion, small rules may tell us something about obedience, autonomy and the consequences of resistance. JSH Law examines Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, what it can help us understand about patterns of domestic abuse, and why it must never be mistaken for proof.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

When “Fairness” Becomes a Weapon: What Dr Emma Katz’s New Work Teaches Us About Coercive Control

/
Coercive control can hide behind apparently reasonable ideas about fairness, responsibility and boundaries. Drawing on new work by Dr Emma Katz, JSH Law examines how unequal rules, false symmetry and victim resistance can be misunderstood in Family Court proceedings.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Seeing the Pattern: What the Major Coercive-Control Frameworks Can — and Cannot — Tell the Family Court

/
There is no single test for coercive control. JSH Law compares the major frameworks used to understand patterns of abuse — from Evan Stark and Duluth to Emma Katz, DARA, Jane Monckton Smith, Robert Kaiser and Carisa Carlton — and asks what each can legitimately contribute to Family Court evidence.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproductive Coercion, Pregnancy and the Family Court: When “Historic” Abuse Still Matters

/
Abuse does not become irrelevant simply because it happened during pregnancy or before a child was born. Reproductive coercion can include contraception interference, forced pregnancy, pressure concerning abortion or reproductive treatment and other conduct designed to undermine reproductive autonomy. This guide explains how such allegations may become relevant in Family Court proceedings, what evidence matters and how to present the history without confusing allegation, evidence and finding.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Canada Is Treating Coercive Control as a Pattern — Are UK Family Courts Doing Enough?

/
Canada is developing a striking three-layer legal response to coercive control across family, civil and criminal law. JSH Law examines what has actually changed, why social-media descriptions of a new “tier” of family violence need clarification, and what England and Wales can learn about patterns of abuse, children, post-separation control and family-court evidence.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pressured Into Swinging? UK Consent and Court Guide

/
Being married, joining a swingers’ website or sending apparently enthusiastic messages does not automatically prove free consent. This practical guide explains how to report sexual coercion, preserve digital evidence, challenge a no-further-action decision and present relevant allegations in the Family Court.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

CPS Tells Prosecutors to Expose Patterns of Past Misconduct in Rape Trials

/
The CPS has updated its Rape and Serious Sexual Offences guidance, encouraging prosecutors to consider suspects’ past patterns of behaviour where legally admissible. This article explains what bad character evidence is, why the suspect-focused approach matters, and why patterns of abuse are important in both criminal and family court contexts.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Government Finally Recognises Economic Abuse in Financial Remedy Cases – Could This Transform Family Justice?

/
The Government's new consultation, A Fairer End to Relationships, could mark a major turning point in family law. For the first time, ministers have explicitly recognised that domestic abuse and economic abuse can continue through the financial remedy process itself. From the controversial "gasp factor" to cohabitation rights and enforcement of financial orders, we examine what these proposals could mean for survivors, litigants in person and the future of family justice.
JSH Law Resources and Guidance for Litigants in Person – practical family court information explained in plain English.© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.

Coercive Control Is Not “High Conflict”: How Legal Technology Could Help Victims Build Watertight Evidence

/
Coercive control is not “high conflict”. It is a pattern of domination, fear and control. This article examines the law, conviction gap, child victim status, evidential challenges and how legal technology could help litigants in person build stronger, clearer coercive control evidence in family court.