© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI Slop, Costs and Litigants in Person: Should Courts Sanction Bad AI Use?
/
0 Comments
AI can produce 50 pages in seconds, but somebody still has to read, check and answer them. JSH Law examines Sir Robert Buckland KC’s call for courts to use existing costs powers against irresponsible AI-generated litigation — and why the answer must protect litigants in person who use AI responsibly to access justice.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Should AI Become a Legal Person? Imogen Rivers, Robot Rights and the Responsibility Gap
Could an autonomous AI hold legal rights, owe legal duties or become responsible when things go wrong? Drawing on Imogen Rivers' Oxford research, JSH Law examines robot rights, lethal autonomous weapons, responsibility gaps and the danger of allowing artificial personhood to become a liability shield for humans.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI Can State Facts. Can It Tell the Truth? Why the Difference Matters in Law
AI can generate a factually correct sentence. But can it truthfully speak in the human sense — with knowledge, belief and responsibility behind the words? Drawing on Kim and Jo's work on Heidegger and Foucault, JSH Law asks what the distinction means for witness statements, Family Court evidence and responsible legal AI.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Behaviour Is Not Need: Why Family Lawyers Need Cross-Disciplinary Literacy
A child's behaviour may be the most visible part of a case without explaining what that child actually needs. Prompted by Adelle Banks' call for “professional curiosity without professional trespass”, JSH Law examines what family lawyers can learn from social work, Cafcass, youth justice and deprivation-of-liberty assessment frameworks.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.“Welfare Is Not Enough”: Re E [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 and Special Guardianship Orders in Care Proceedings
In Re E [2026] EWCA Civ 1167, the Court of Appeal held that a Special Guardianship Order placing a child permanently outside the birth family could not be approached as a simple welfare choice. JSH Law explains why threshold, factual findings, necessity and proportionality matter.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Seeing the Pattern: What the Major Coercive-Control Frameworks Can — and Cannot — Tell the Family Court
There is no single test for coercive control. JSH Law compares the major frameworks used to understand patterns of abuse — from Evan Stark and Duluth to Emma Katz, DARA, Jane Monckton Smith, Robert Kaiser and Carisa Carlton — and asks what each can legitimately contribute to Family Court evidence.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Can AI Feel Pain? What the “Pain Axis” Study Really Means for Human Safety and Legal AI
A viral study says AI models contain a “pain axis” and may accept harm to users in order to remove an induced internal state. The research does not prove AI consciousness. Its more immediate significance is what it reveals about model behaviour, human safety and the risks of giving increasingly capable AI systems consequential powers.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.From Incidents to Trajectories: What Robert Kaiser’s Research Could Teach the Family Court About Coercive Control Evidence
Domestic-abuse evidence is often fragmented across police, health records, schools, Cafcass and digital communications. Drawing on Robert Kaiser's work on behavioural trajectories and Escalation Pattern Analysis, JSH Law examines how chronology, patterns and changing behaviour could be made more visible in Family Court evidence — without turning an emerging research framework into an unsupported risk assessment.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Delay Is Not Administrative: What Family Justice Can Learn from the New Criminal Court Listing Framework
A new national criminal-court listing framework requires judges to consider the human impact of delay. It does not apply to the Family Court — but its central principle raises an important question for family justice: are we measuring delay in weeks, or by what those weeks actually do to children and families?
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd“The Obligations Are Unchanged”: What Re C Really Says About Domestic Abuse in Child Focused Courts
The Court of Appeal says domestic-abuse obligations remain unchanged under the new Child Focused Court model. That does not mean the Family Court is unreformed. It means faster procedure cannot dilute PD12J, safeguarding or procedural fairness.
