Technology-facilitated domestic abuse can involve GPS tracking, smart devices, compromised accounts and digital surveillance. This practical JSH Law guide explains how litigants in person can preserve, organise and present digital evidence without losing the wider pattern of coercive control.

A litigant filed a 300-page ChatGPT-assisted skeleton argument. The real lesson from Hancox v Sutherland is not that AI has no place in court, but that technology cannot replace verification, evidential discipline, relevance or human judgment.

Five years after the Harm Panel exposed serious problems in the treatment of domestic abuse in private law children proceedings, the IDAS Family Court Report 2026 suggests many survivors are still encountering the same failure points. JSH Law examines what has changed, what has not, and why implementation may now be the central family justice challenge.