© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Trying to Change Family Law From the Outside: A Personal Reflection on Access to Justice
/
0 Comments
Kate Daly set out to make divorce less painful and found her business model scrutinised in the High Court. Her story made me reflect on what I am trying to build through JSH Law: a safe, clearly bounded space between full legal representation and facing the Family Court completely alone.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.How to Keep Your Address Confidential in Family Court: C8, Evidence and the Mistake That Can Reveal Your Location
Form C8 can protect your address and contact details in Family Court proceedings, but it does not automatically remove them from your evidence. This practical 2026 guide explains the new rules, accidental disclosure risks, safe document checking and what to do if confidential information has already been filed.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.ICFA Has Been Replaced: What Cafcass Enabling Family Time Means for Contact and Your Family Court Case
Cafcass has replaced ICFA with Enabling Family Time, a shorter child-focused service for rebuilding or maintaining important relationships during private Family Court proceedings. This practical guide explains referrals, sessions, safeguarding, session notes, what Cafcass reports to court and how parents can prepare.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Child Focused Courts 2026: What Parents Need to Know
Child Focused Courts are being rolled out across England and Wales. This practical guide explains what the new private-law children model means for Cafcass, Child Impact Reports, domestic abuse, evidence and litigants in person.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI May Democratise Legal Drafting. Can the Courts Survive the Volume?
Generative AI may lower one of the traditional barriers to enforcing legal rights: the cost of producing legal material. But judicial attention remains scarce. JSH Law examines what happens if AI scales legal drafting faster than the court system can scale its capacity.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When AI Stops Answering and Starts Acting: Agentic AI, Legal Responsibility and the Next Professional Risk
Agentic AI can plan, select tools and take actions across legal workflows. That creates a new set of risks around authority, confidentiality, supervision and accountability. JSH Law asks what responsible delegation should look like.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.If AI Does the Junior Work, Who Trains the Lawyers of 2035?
Artificial intelligence is automating many of the tasks traditionally used to train junior lawyers. If clients will no longer pay for repetitive processing, the profession must become much more deliberate about teaching judgment, ethics, strategy and client counselling.
© 2026 Jessica Susan Hill / JSH Law. All rights reserved.When Domestic Abuse Becomes Normal: Why a Child’s Wish for Contact Cannot Be Read in Isolation
A child can love an abusive parent, miss them and want contact with them. That does not, by itself, establish that contact is emotionally safe. Re C [2026] EWCA Civ 1216 exposes the difficult safeguarding question of how courts should understand children’s wishes when domestic abuse has shaped their understanding of family life.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.The Jury Trial U-Turn Is Not the End of Court Reform: What the 2026 Courts and Tribunals Bill Still Changes
The Government has abandoned its wider plan for judge-alone Crown Court trials — but the Courts and Tribunals Bill is far from dead. JSH Law examines what still changes, including jury-trial election, magistrates’ powers, criminal appeals, AI-assisted court administration and the proposed repeal of the Family Court’s parental-involvement presumption.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI Slop, Costs and Litigants in Person: Should Courts Sanction Bad AI Use?
AI can produce 50 pages in seconds, but somebody still has to read, check and answer them. JSH Law examines Sir Robert Buckland KC’s call for courts to use existing costs powers against irresponsible AI-generated litigation — and why the answer must protect litigants in person who use AI responsibly to access justice.
