© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When a 15-Year-Old Refuses Contact: Why the Family Court Discharged the Child Arrangements Order
/
0 Comments
What happens when a Child Arrangements Order intended to preserve a relationship begins damaging it? In [2026] EWFC 277 (B), the Family Court discharged an order concerning a 15-year-old who had refused contact with his father for around nine months.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI Evidence in the Family Court: Deepfakes, Screenshots & Digital Evidence
AI can generate convincing text, audio, photographs and video — and the Ministry of Justice has now identified synthetic and manipulated evidence as an emerging risk to the justice system. For family-court litigants, the practical response is not panic. It is better evidence discipline: preserve originals, retain context, record provenance and understand what each item actually proves.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When the Paperwork Looks Right—but the Child Is Still Missing
Family court paperwork can be technically complete while still losing the context that matters. This article examines eight developments in family justice—from domestic abuse and Cafcass evidence to AI, expert reports, neurodiversity and Child Focused Courts—and introduces a six-question framework for checking how important conclusions are reached.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Does the Family Court Need a Fact-Finding Hearing? Cafcass, PD12J and Domestic Abuse Allegations
If domestic-abuse allegations are disputed in a child-arrangements case, the Family Court does not automatically need a separate fact-finding hearing. But serious allegations cannot simply be left unresolved if Cafcass or the court needs to know whether they are true before assessing risk. This guide explains the current Cafcass practice aid, the PD12J test and what evidence the court actually needs.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Danny Tommo Court Case Explained: Bail, Court Speed and the Rule of Law
Daniel Thomas’s criminal case moved from arrest and charge to a magistrates’ court appearance within a remarkably short period. Against a record Crown Court backlog, that has prompted questions about whether the case is receiving exceptional treatment. But rapid first appearances for defendants kept in custody are built into criminal procedure. This article separates the publicly known facts from speculation and asks what evidence would actually be needed before drawing conclusions about equal treatment before the law.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Reproductive Coercion, Pregnancy and the Family Court: When “Historic” Abuse Still Matters
Abuse does not become irrelevant simply because it happened during pregnancy or before a child was born. Reproductive coercion can include contraception interference, forced pregnancy, pressure concerning abortion or reproductive treatment and other conduct designed to undermine reproductive autonomy. This guide explains how such allegations may become relevant in Family Court proceedings, what evidence matters and how to present the history without confusing allegation, evidence and finding.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Form D11 in Family Proceedings: How to Complete It, File It Properly and Prove It Is Before the Court
Sending a D11 to the Family Court does not necessarily mean it has been issued, served, listed or placed before the judge. This practical JSH Law guide explains how to prepare, file and track a D11 properly — and what to do if the court cannot find it.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.My Child Is Living Under a Special Guardianship Order and I Want Them Back: What Can I Actually Do?
A Special Guardianship Order is a serious long-term order, but it is not adoption and it is not necessarily the end of a birth parent's relationship with their child. This practical guide explains contact, discharge, significant change in circumstances, disputed expert evidence and how to turn understandable anger into evidence the Family Court can act upon.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Cafcass, Domestic Abuse Allegations and Fact-Finding: Lessons from Re D
The Court of Appeal’s decision in D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic Abuse Allegations) [2026] EWCA Civ 969 explains that Cafcass can assess safeguarding risks but cannot treat disputed allegations as established facts. The judgment highlights when fact-finding may need reconsideration, the importance of the welfare checklist and practical issues for litigants in person responding to section 7 reports.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Clare’s Law: Does Domestic Abuse Disclosure Keep Women Safe? | JSH Law
Clare’s Law can provide vital information about a partner’s history of domestic abuse — but disclosure is not the same as protection. As University of Leeds researchers examine how the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme works in practice, JSH Law looks at information-sharing, coercive control, safeguarding and what happens after a disclosure is made.
