Posts
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd“The Obligations Are Unchanged”: What Re C Really Says About Domestic Abuse in Child Focused Courts
/
0 Comments
The Court of Appeal says domestic-abuse obligations remain unchanged under the new Child Focused Court model. That does not mean the Family Court is unreformed. It means faster procedure cannot dilute PD12J, safeguarding or procedural fairness.
© 2026 JSH Law LtdTechnology-Facilitated Abuse in the Family Court: GPS Tracking, Smart Devices & Digital Evidence
Technology-facilitated domestic abuse can involve GPS tracking, smart devices, compromised accounts and digital surveillance. This practical JSH Law guide explains how litigants in person can preserve, organise and present digital evidence without losing the wider pattern of coercive control.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Domestic Abuse in the Family Court: What the IDAS Family Court Report 2026 Reveals Five Years After the Harm Panel
Five years after the Harm Panel exposed serious problems in the treatment of domestic abuse in private law children proceedings, the IDAS Family Court Report 2026 suggests many survivors are still encountering the same failure points. JSH Law examines what has changed, what has not, and why implementation may now be the central family justice challenge.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Child Focused Courts Must Still Be Fair: Re C [2026] EWCA Civ 1216
The Court of Appeal has given its first judgment on the new Child Focused Court model. Re C [2026] EWCA Civ 1216 examines domestic abuse, Cafcass recommendations, fact-finding, informed agreement, procedural fairness and section 91(14).
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Unregulated Experts in the Family Court: The New 2026 Rules and What Parents Need to Check
Since 20 July 2026, new Family Procedure Rules restrict the use of unregulated experts in children proceedings. This practical guide explains who counts as a regulated expert, the exceptions, what Re Y means for parental-alienation and domestic-abuse cases, and how litigants in person can audit and respond to an expert report.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.AI Evidence in the Family Court: Deepfakes, Screenshots & Digital Evidence
AI can generate convincing text, audio, photographs and video — and the Ministry of Justice has now identified synthetic and manipulated evidence as an emerging risk to the justice system. For family-court litigants, the practical response is not panic. It is better evidence discipline: preserve originals, retain context, record provenance and understand what each item actually proves.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.When the Paperwork Looks Right—but the Child Is Still Missing
Family court paperwork can be technically complete while still losing the context that matters. This article examines eight developments in family justice—from domestic abuse and Cafcass evidence to AI, expert reports, neurodiversity and Child Focused Courts—and introduces a six-question framework for checking how important conclusions are reached.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Does the Family Court Need a Fact-Finding Hearing? Cafcass, PD12J and Domestic Abuse Allegations
If domestic-abuse allegations are disputed in a child-arrangements case, the Family Court does not automatically need a separate fact-finding hearing. But serious allegations cannot simply be left unresolved if Cafcass or the court needs to know whether they are true before assessing risk. This guide explains the current Cafcass practice aid, the PD12J test and what evidence the court actually needs.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Reproductive Coercion, Pregnancy and the Family Court: When “Historic” Abuse Still Matters
Abuse does not become irrelevant simply because it happened during pregnancy or before a child was born. Reproductive coercion can include contraception interference, forced pregnancy, pressure concerning abortion or reproductive treatment and other conduct designed to undermine reproductive autonomy. This guide explains how such allegations may become relevant in Family Court proceedings, what evidence matters and how to present the history without confusing allegation, evidence and finding.
© 2026 JSH Law Ltd. All rights reserved.Cafcass, Domestic Abuse Allegations and Fact-Finding: Lessons from Re D
The Court of Appeal’s decision in D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic Abuse Allegations) [2026] EWCA Civ 969 explains that Cafcass can assess safeguarding risks but cannot treat disputed allegations as established facts. The judgment highlights when fact-finding may need reconsideration, the importance of the welfare checklist and practical issues for litigants in person responding to section 7 reports.
